Today, we are going to solve Optiver’s challenges from their new Prove It series which I have really enjoyed. I will just be providing the mathematical proofs, but if you are interested to see what these formulas and equations mean, please see this video for reference (problems are near the end): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmtscKsfMTg
Prove that
We are going to first invoke which states
Setting we obtain
but it is well-known that , so we really have
This is very useful as it allows us to eliminate the summation in our original problem. We now have to just show
Note that
For large values of , we can use Stirling’s approximation:
Applying this to the factorials in the expression for , we have
Hence,
We just need to check
which is trivial. Thus, we have shown that:
Prove that
for all (this condition was not mentioned in the video, but it is nessasary).
As in the first exercise, we can eliminate the summation using combinatorial identities. So it remains to show that
for all . We will induct on .
The base case of holds as , so now assume the inequality holds for . That is, assume
We will show this holds for as well by proving
We will start by rewriting the expression for in terms of . Observe
Hence,
By the inductive hypothesis,
so
But note we must have
because we always have
Thus
which completes the induction.
We have successfully shown
for all .
Find an interesting solution? Feel free to submit it to Optiver directly at https://optiver.com/prove-it-1